Contact:Sherry Zhou
WhatsApp/Mobile:
+86-189 17398894
E-mail:sherry.z@naboer.com.cn
Переключиться на русскую версию
Welcome to Anhui Nabor Mechanical and Electrical Equipment Co., Ltd.
Selecting a Rexroth flow control valve starts with a simple question: what does the circuit need the oil flow to do? In many industrial hydraulic systems, flow determines actuator speed, but the correct valve depends on more than the required liters per minute. Load variation, pressure differential, direction of movement, mounting arrangement and the need for pressure compensation can all change the suitable solution.
A basic throttle valve may be sufficient where load conditions remain predictable. A pressure-compensated flow regulator becomes more relevant when actuator speed needs to remain comparatively stable as the load changes. Other circuits may require controlled flow in one direction and relatively free return flow in the other.
Buyers reviewing available hydraulic components can begin with Nabor's Bosch Rexroth hydraulic valve range and then narrow the requirement using the circuit conditions below.

Before choosing a valve series, identify the machine movement that needs speed control.
Typical requirements include:
Controlling cylinder extension speed
Controlling cylinder retraction speed
Regulating hydraulic motor speed
Maintaining a repeatable feed rate
Slowing an actuator near part of its working cycle
Balancing flow between different circuit branches
This distinction matters because the same nominal flow requirement can lead to different valve arrangements depending on where the valve is installed and how the load behaves.
One of the first decisions is whether the circuit can tolerate flow changing as pressure conditions change.
A simple throttle or restrictor changes the available flow area. It can be a practical solution for circuits where the load is relatively stable and extremely consistent actuator speed is not required.
The limitation is that flow through a restriction is influenced by the pressure difference across it. If the load changes significantly, actuator speed may also change.
A pressure-compensated flow regulator is designed to reduce the effect that changing pressure differential has on the metered flow within its specified operating range.
This makes pressure compensation more relevant for applications where:
Actuator speed needs to remain relatively stable
The machine load changes during the cycle
Process feed rate affects product quality
Repeatability matters more than basic manual adjustment
Bosch Rexroth's flow regulator technical documentation distinguishes simple flow restrictors from pressure-compensated flow regulators and provides a useful technical reference when defining this requirement.
Pressure compensation does not describe the complete circuit arrangement.
Buyers may also encounter two-way and three-way regulator concepts.
A two-port pressure-compensated regulator meters the flow passing through the valve. Depending on the circuit design, excess pump flow may need to pass through another system path such as the main pressure relief arrangement.
This type of configuration can be suitable where the circuit architecture already manages excess flow appropriately.
A three-port regulator can meter the required controlled flow while diverting excess flow through a bypass path.
The practical choice therefore depends not only on actuator flow but also on what the hydraulic system should do with the remaining pump delivery.
When preparing an RFQ, indicate whether the circuit already provides a separate path for excess flow rather than requesting only “a 20 L/min flow control valve.”
The position of the flow control valve in relation to the actuator can change machine behavior significantly.
Meter-in control restricts the flow entering the actuator.
It can work well where the hydraulic supply needs to determine actuator speed and the external load does not tend to drive the actuator faster than the incoming oil can control.
Meter-out control restricts the oil leaving the actuator.
This arrangement is often considered when the load may tend to overrun or drive the actuator. Controlling the outgoing flow can help maintain back pressure and reduce uncontrolled acceleration.
The preferred arrangement depends on the actual machine mechanics, load direction and actuator behavior. It should not be selected from a catalogue name alone.
Some applications need controlled movement in one direction but fast, relatively unrestricted movement in the opposite direction.
In that case, the circuit may use a flow control function combined with a reverse-flow check valve.
Typical examples include:
Controlled cylinder feed with rapid return
Controlled lowering followed by faster retraction
Machine-tool feed circuits
Material-handling movements with different forward and return speeds
The RFQ should therefore state whether flow must be controlled in both directions or only one direction.
Required flow should come from the machine operating requirement.
For a hydraulic cylinder, useful inputs include:
Cylinder bore
Rod diameter
Required extension speed
Required retraction speed
Available pump flow
Cylinder extension and retraction may require different flow rates because the effective piston areas are different.
For a hydraulic motor, displacement and required rotational speed become relevant.
Do not automatically select the valve with the highest available flow rating. A valve should provide the required operating range while still allowing suitable adjustment and pressure-loss characteristics.
Buyers often provide only the maximum pump flow.
That value is useful, but the normal controlled flow is also important.
Consider a machine where the pump can supply 80 L/min but the controlled feed movement normally requires only 8 to 15 L/min. A component chosen only because it can pass 80 L/min may not necessarily provide the most useful adjustment range for that working condition.
For an RFQ, record:
Normal controlled flow
Minimum useful flow
Maximum required controlled flow
Total pump delivery
A flow-control specification should not be reduced to a single L/min value.
Flow through a restriction depends on the pressure differential across the metering element. Pressure-compensated regulators are designed to manage this relationship more consistently, but they still operate within defined pressure and flow limits.
Provide:
Normal system pressure
Maximum system pressure
Expected load pressure
Required controlled flow
Known pressure differential across the valve where available
This keeps the flow-control decision separate from a general valve-sizing exercise.

Throttling hydraulic flow creates a pressure drop, and the hydraulic power lost across that restriction ultimately appears largely as heat.
For occasional or relatively low-power movements, this may be acceptable. In continuously operating, high-flow circuits, however, excessive throttling can increase oil temperature and reduce system efficiency.
Before selecting the valve, review:
How much flow will be throttled
Pressure difference across the valve
How long the machine operates in the throttled condition
Oil temperature limits
Reservoir and cooling capacity
If substantial hydraulic power is continuously being converted into heat, the circuit architecture itself may deserve review rather than simply increasing the size of the flow control valve.
Once the hydraulic function is defined, check how the valve will physically connect to the system.
Depending on the Rexroth product family and machine design, a flow-control function may be implemented using:
In-line installation
Subplate mounting
Sandwich or modular construction
Cartridge installation
Manifold integration
For replacement work, record the existing connection arrangement, port sizes and mounting interface rather than assuming that a valve with the correct flow range will physically fit.
Flow-control performance is also influenced by the hydraulic fluid and operating environment.
Record:
Hydraulic fluid type
Known viscosity range
Fluid temperature
Ambient temperature
Filtration condition
Seal material requirement
Fluid viscosity changes with temperature, and this can influence flow behavior, particularly in simple throttling arrangements.
Contamination can also affect small metering passages, so the cleanliness requirements for the selected valve should be checked against the existing hydraulic system.
A manually adjusted or mechanically compensated flow regulator is not the only way to control actuator speed.
Some machines require the flow command to change continuously during the operating cycle under PLC or motion-controller control.
In that situation, a proportional directional valve may be more appropriate than a fixed flow-control setting.
For example, the Rexroth R901382349 4WRPEH6 proportional directional valve combines proportional hydraulic control with integrated electronics and position feedback for applications requiring electronically controlled movement.
It should not be confused with a conventional flow regulator. The example is useful because it shows where the selection question changes from “How much flow should be mechanically regulated?” to “Does the machine need electronically variable motion control?”
A directional valve primarily determines which hydraulic paths are connected. A flow-control valve primarily regulates how much fluid passes through the controlled path.
Many machines need both functions.
If the unresolved question is spool symbol, neutral condition, switching positions or direction of actuator movement, see Nabor's Rexroth directional control valve circuit selection guide rather than trying to solve that problem through a flow regulator.
| Circuit Requirement | Selection Direction |
|---|---|
| Basic speed adjustment with stable load | Review a simple throttle or flow restriction solution |
| Speed should remain more stable as load changes | Review a pressure-compensated flow regulator |
| Controlled flow in one direction and freer reverse flow | Review a flow control configuration with reverse-flow check function |
| Overrunning or load-driven actuator | Evaluate whether meter-out control is appropriate |
| Stable resisting load | Meter-in control may be considered depending on circuit behavior |
| Excess pump flow needs a bypass path | Review a 3-way bypass regulator concept |
| Flow command changes continuously from the PLC | Review proportional hydraulic control instead of a fixed regulator |
| Existing manifold or stacked valve station | Confirm sandwich, subplate or manifold mounting compatibility |
A useful RFQ should describe the circuit instead of providing only a target flow.
| RFQ Item | Information to Provide |
|---|---|
| Machine / application | Equipment and movement being controlled |
| Controlled actuator | Cylinder, hydraulic motor or other actuator |
| Normal flow | Expected operating flow |
| Minimum flow | Lowest useful controlled flow if relevant |
| Maximum flow | Highest expected flow through the valve |
| Operating pressure | Normal and maximum system pressure |
| Load behavior | Stable, changing or overrunning load |
| Metering arrangement | Meter-in, meter-out or not yet confirmed |
| Reverse flow | Controlled or free reverse flow required |
| Compensation | Pressure compensation required or not confirmed |
| Mounting | In-line, sandwich, subplate, cartridge or manifold |
| Hydraulic fluid | Fluid type and specification |
| Temperature | Fluid and ambient operating range |
| Existing part number | Complete Rexroth material number if replacing a valve |
| Quantity | Required quantity |
| Destination | Delivery country or location |

It depends on the required speed stability and how much the circuit load changes. A simple restriction may be sufficient for less demanding conditions, while a pressure-compensated regulator is generally more appropriate when flow needs to remain comparatively stable despite changing pressure conditions.
Meter-in controls the oil entering the actuator. Meter-out controls oil leaving the actuator. The preferred arrangement depends on load direction and whether the actuator can be driven by the external load.
Changing load changes pressure conditions in the hydraulic circuit. With a simple throttle arrangement, that can change the flow through the restriction and therefore the actuator speed.
Provide both. Maximum flow helps establish capacity, while normal and minimum controlled flow help determine whether the proposed valve provides a useful operating and adjustment range.
Usually not. Pressure conditions, compensation requirement, load behavior, metering arrangement, mounting, fluid and temperature should also be considered.
Proportional control becomes relevant when the machine needs the commanded flow or actuator speed to change electronically during the operating cycle rather than remain at a manually or mechanically adjusted setting.
Selecting a Rexroth flow control valve is primarily a circuit decision.
Determine the required actuator speed, normal and maximum flow, load behavior, pressure conditions and whether the circuit needs simple throttling, pressure compensation, one-way metering or bypass regulation. Then confirm mounting, hydraulic fluid and operating conditions before comparing individual valve configurations.
For a Nabor inquiry, provide the existing Rexroth part number where available together with the hydraulic schematic, flow requirement, pressure data and application description. If a particular valve is proposed, ask which operating conditions were confirmed and which values still depend on assumptions.
Contact:Sherry Zhou
WhatsApp/Mobile:
+86-189 17398894
E-mail:sherry.z@naboer.com.cn
Contact:JiaWen Zhou
Phone:+86-199 56011825
E-mail:zjw@naboer.com.cn
Add:Rm706, Building A6 ,Hefei Financial Port, Yangzijiang Road, Baohe District, Hefei City, Anhui Province, China